I find it interesting that the
patent-holder of GIFs tried to regulate their use for a while, how would you do
that? They have only become easier to create as time went by.
I agree that GIFs are a kind of
“mini-cinema” as Tom Moody calls them, but I would not categorize them in with
JPEGs and PNGs, I find them too different to be categorized with unchanging
still images.
I think Morse’s choice of “personal and
disposable” to be perfect descriptors of the GIF. They are for a moment,
extremely engaging, and we connect with them one at a time through our digital
displays, then discard them without a second thought.
It is fascinating how an artist can
make a GIF, like OptiDisc so that
viewers get drawn in, and cannot describe why they are mesmerized; by making
the GIF have “missing frames” that viewer’s minds fill in while watching. Weird
stuff.
GIFs generally have some element of
humor. Even if the subject matter is serious, or not actually funny, the effect
of watching something that is generally less than 10 seconds repeat itself over
and over has that affect.
No comments:
Post a Comment